7 results for 'cat:"Sanctions" AND cat:"Discovery" AND cat:"Contract"'.
J. Lamberth grants the contractor's motion for sanctions in the subcontractor's suit against it stemming from a dispute over a renovation of the Latvian Embassy. The contractor is awarded attorney's fees and costs and the subcontractor is prohibited from introducing evidence relating to costs incurred on the project and opposing the contractor's expert's cost opinions, as sanction for repeated and flagrant failures to follow court orders and produce required discovery.
Court: USDC District of Columbia, Judge: Lamberth, Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv1643, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: sanctions, discovery, contract
J. James partly grants a machinery and supply company's motion for sanctions concerning a mining company's failure to produce discovery of state dealer protection regulations. The machinery and supply company sufficiently showed in court that the mining company may have wrongfully cancelled a service agreement without adequate notification.
Court: USDC Kansas, Judge: James, Filed On: January 5, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv2331, NOS: Franchise - Contract, Categories: sanctions, discovery, contract
J. Major grants a jet charter company's motion for monetary sanctions in a contract dispute brought by a doctor. Despite being ordered to provide discovery and warned that sanctions would be issued if he continued to fail to comply with his discovery obligations, the doctor failed to participate in discovery, pay prior sanctions, file any document, or appear in court as ordered. The doctor and his counsel are ordered to pay $1,140. Furthermore, it is recommended that the district judge issue a dismissal sanction.
Court: USDC Southern District of California, Judge: Major, Filed On: December 19, 2023, Case #: 3:19cv49, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: sanctions, discovery, contract
Per curiam, the appeals court finds the trial court needs to hold an evidentiary hearing to make specific findings to support its dismissal with prejudice of the rehab center's lawsuit against the citizen for nonpayment for services it provided to her after her trip and fall accident. Though the trial court still may find dismissal necessary for alleged discovery violations committed by the center, including failing to comply with multiple court orders demanding its complete responses to the citizen's discovery requests, it needs to address each of the six factors laid out by Florida Supreme Court precedent to support its order. Reversed.
Court: Florida Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: August 30, 2023, Case #: 22-1496, Categories: sanctions, discovery, contract
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Oliver reverses the district court decision to bar evidence of damages on contract, misrepresentation and other claims since defendants failed to brief the issue on appeal. Defendants also failed to create a reviewable brief of their challenge to the district court imposition of terminating sanctions for discovery violations. Reversed in part.
Court: Utah Court Of Appeals, Judge: Oliver, Filed On: July 6, 2023, Case #: 20210726-CA, Categories: sanctions, discovery, contract